Gun Control Debate thread - Page 54 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2012, 08:43 PM   #531 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by poutanen View Post
Yeah for me it was an accuracy thing. I actually preferred shooting an old Sears-Robuck single shot 12 gauge break action to the 870 because I was better with it (even though the 870 is a MUCH better gun)... So far with this Citori field gun I'm hitting a lot more than I ever have before. I think my best round so far is 18/25 birds! (which is actually horrible for those that don't shoot)

The only way I justified getting the 3rd shotgun is by selling my first rifle (a Tikka T3 22-250 w/scope and bipod) and my handgun (a SIG P226 .40)... I just find I have more fun shooting at a moving target than paper!
I've got a P226 .40 as well. The moving target definitely adds to the fun.
sleev-les is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 08:51 PM   #532 (permalink)
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,686
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sleev-les View Post
I've got a P226 .40 as well. The moving target definitely adds to the fun.
Yeah I LOVED the SIG, unfortunately it cost $50 every time I wanted to shoot it at the local range (I wasn't willing to spend $600 for a full membership per year), and it ended up just being something I looked at, stripped, cleaned, and put back together a lot.

Same with the rifle. I loved it, but after putting holes in paper at 200 yards and hitting a steel plate, I got kinda bored. Trap/skeet/sporting is tough enough that I ALWAYS feel like I've accomplished something when I've been out shooting. Plus I find it more of a social event than going to an indoor range to fire a handgun, or sitting on a bench with the rifle.
poutanen is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 08:59 PM   #533 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by poutanen View Post
Yeah I LOVED the SIG, unfortunately it cost $50 every time I wanted to shoot it at the local range (I wasn't willing to spend $600 for a full membership per year), and it ended up just being something I looked at, stripped, cleaned, and put back together a lot.

Same with the rifle. I loved it, but after putting holes in paper at 200 yards and hitting a steel plate, I got kinda bored. Trap/skeet/sporting is tough enough that I ALWAYS feel like I've accomplished something when I've been out shooting. Plus I find it more of a social event than going to an indoor range to fire a handgun, or sitting on a bench with the rifle.
Getting a beer can to explode at 300 yards is pretty interesting. Or hitting a watermelon with a 50 cal muzzle loader. We go out to a friends farm sometimes (250 acres) when its not hunting season and shoot out there a lot. We bring out different target types so there isn't much of a bored factor.
sleev-les is offline  
Old 12-20-2012, 12:40 PM   #534 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Casual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 726
Default

I saw this and it made me think of this thread:



From Wikepedia:

In 2012 the FDA re-issued their import alert stating “The imbedded non-nutritive objects in these confectionery products may pose a public health risk as the consumer may unknowingly choke on the object.”
Casual is offline  
Old 12-20-2012, 12:54 PM   #535 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,529
Default

it gets worse than that.
__________________
2013/14 -12- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06
KIRKRIDER is offline  
Old 12-20-2012, 01:31 PM   #536 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
cc898's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 155
Default

Yes it does, and its not all gun related! Its "protecting stupid people" thing.

Nice fake guns on the left though. Video game.
cc898 is offline  
Old 12-20-2012, 04:31 PM   #537 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Front range, CO
Posts: 278
Default

Yes I would defend my house in a gun fight, I live with loved ones and unless I can 100% ensure their safety I'm not running out of my own home. I would call that cowardice, you can call it what you like. I'm done arguing my point here, instead I'll point out how off the chain shit is...

Background check waitlist is something insane like 41 hours here in Colorado. Went to a gun shop yesterday and there was a fucking line out the door and around the corner.... Everyone buying AR15 parts/ammo. Looked at a Glock 30 that was marked up over $100 over MSRP. (I didn't buy) 30 round magazines for AR15's are also (that I bought a month ago for $10.99) selling for $59.99 if you can find them in stock. Nutz
StreetDoc is offline  
Old 12-20-2012, 05:20 PM   #538 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,529
Default

Why stop at an AR 15 ? Everybody has one....

Not man enough? Buy a gun

That's the message of ads the company has been running, along with a particularly ridiculous social media campaign. Until today -- the page has apparently been taken down, but parts of it are visible here -- you could learn on the "Man Card" section of Bushmaster's website that "In a world of rapidly depleting testosterone, the Bushmaster Man Card declares and confirms that you are a man's man." Then you could fill out a little form to bust on your buddies for not being manly enough, to "Revoke a Man Card." Just enter a brief description of the offense and put it into one of five categories: "Cry baby," "Cupcake," "Short leash," "Coward," or "Just unmanly."

more>>
__________________
2013/14 -12- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06
KIRKRIDER is offline  
Old 12-20-2012, 11:37 PM   #539 (permalink)
With extra cheese.
 
CheeseForSteeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,750
Default

The Second Amendment does not recognize our right to own "guns". It recognizes our right to "arms" and the use of that word is very specific and intentional. Arms are what are used for a free man to protect his own right to life, both against criminals and a tyrannical government. They didn't write right to bear "muskets", "ball-and-cap revolvers" or anything like that. Every single empire has eventually crumbled and devolved into tyranny and the framers of The Constitution had just fought a revolutionary war to assert their sovereignty from a tyrant. It is our last check on government if our political process fails; and I think most would agree, our political process is failing as it's being bought out by lobbyist interests from ALL sides of the political spectrum. "Arms" is a colloquialism to mean the use of force to protect ones natural rights; for more information on that, start with Thomas Paine's the Rights of Man. It also doesn't state the government shall regulate arms. It says, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state COMMA the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." A well regulated militia is the justification for the people to keep and bear arms; so that the people will ultimately regulate the militia and not the other way around. It has nothing to do with the regulation of arms.

The fact is, bad things will continue to happen. Mass murders will continue to happen. Ban and confiscate guns. Logistically, how you would confiscate something that is possessed on the order of estimated between 200,000,000 and 300,000,000 is beyond me and how you would get them out of the hands of the criminal element is even more far-fetched. Just confiscating guns from law-abiding citizens would be an enormous undertaking by itself. However, that is beside the point. People want something to blame that they can take easy action against to prevent more "bad stuff" from happening. Mental health and the idea of pure evil existing in this world aren't good enough reasons because the former is an extremely complicated issue that doesn't have any "real" solutions for government (it's a cultural one) and the latter is unfixable. So blaming guns and weapons is much easier. Plus, the idea that evil just exists is unpalatable to us in the first world because we've become arrogant to the point where we think we are just exempt from even experiencing the same type of suffering that the majority of the world faces.

As to the weapons themselves, particularly the so-called assault rifle. This weapon does not make a killer effective by itself. If you think so, you're purely ignorant and you're buying into media sensationalism and Hollywood bullshit. It's not easy to shoot something that can move. It's not easy shoot something under stress. It certainly doesn't make it easy to shooting something that is moving while under stress. Go rent one at a local range, if you've never shot before, and see how good you shoot. It takes years of practice to get good with a gun, just like any other weapon or any other tool for that matter.

What does that matter? It means that the effectiveness of a mass murderer is almost purely dictated by his SKILLS, PREPARATION, and WILLINGNESS TO DIE. The weapon itself has a very small bearing. Take away any of those three elements and he becomes much less effective. Take the Chinese school stabbings, and yes, there have been mass fatal stabbings in China. The most recent one resulted in no fatalities probably because the would-be murderer wasn't as SKILLED or PREPARED. The point is, those three things are what make a murderer effective with any sort of implement. Sometimes a murderer with a knife, gun or whatever is effective and sometimes he's not. It's not the weapon itself that matters.

No one is talking about the Oregon mall shooter that happened a week prior to Sandy Hook. In fact, the media is completely downplaying this event:

Armed citizen pulls gun on Oregon mall shooter - Tucson News Now

The man, when confronted by a trained CCW holder who presented his weapon at the murderer, fled. The CCW made the judgement call he couldn't get a shot without hitting a bystander (so much for the Wild West shootout argument against carrying guns) and didn't fire. The murderer fled and KILLED HIMSELF. He didn't have the WILLINGNESS TO DIE. Many of these murderers are cowards. The simple threat of force or the possibility of threat of force, which CCW states create by allowing responsible citizens to carry, is a great deterrent to both simple crimes and mass murderers.

The militaristic features on these guns (detachable magazines and the like) are ergonomic and functional advantages for fighting back against an ARMED enemy. They do little to increase the effectiveness of a mass murderer because he already has every advantage by very nature of how mass murders are carried out. And furthermore, you can't stop a criminal from possessing these features on weapons by making them illegal so what exactly is the point?

Taking away guns is, at best, going to have almost no impact on killing sprees. Contrary to what the media wants you to believe, these types of events are not becoming more common and more people are killed every year with things like knives than with "assault weapons". At the same time, you take away the ability of the physically weak to protect themselves. And worst, you marginalize the ability of the people to fight back against an armed tyrannical state if the worst should happen.

I can't speak for everyone but I know many people like myself are upset about our overly interventionalist foreign policy. A lot of it is UN manipulation of our armed forces for special international interests, IMO. Yet, we can't even get our government to stop sending our military around the world on quasi-imperialistic conquests for the benefit of international interests. To think we could petition it should it try to conquer its own people for the good of its own people without having an armed response is, in my estimation, the height of lunacy.

/rant off

Happy Shredding
CheeseForSteeze is offline  
Old 12-21-2012, 12:09 AM   #540 (permalink)
Land of the Potato
 
IdahoFreshies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 1,228
Default

^ well, first time really dropping into this thread and that just about covers everything I agree with. Good job! Wish more people thought like that!


/thread
__________________
If you don't like the way I drive, stay off the sidewalk.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShredLife View Post
do they even make chaps with asses?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonAvenger View Post
I think they call them pants
IdahoFreshies is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums