![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 79
|
I suggest breaking up the "Boards" forum into subforums:
Rationale: There are roughly 10,000 topics in the "Boards" section right now. That's a LOT of threads to wade through if you're browsing for only certain interests. Significantly more than any other of the various 'gear-related' topics. This could help people parse the massive number of threads easier, especially for breaking out board reviews from other gear reviews. The current "Boards" forum is overly busy. This sorting would more efficiently allow posters to access their interests. One example is the omnipresent "Help choosing my first Board" which permeate the forum. I tend to be interested in All-Mountain, and would like to help give advice, or share experiences with new riders - however, it's hard to tell without reading tons of posts (or seeing "Hey newb, try using the search button") what aspect of riding the person is interested in. From the other perspective, as a rider asking opinions or sharing some info, you'd reach a more targeted audience. I do realize that retroactively sorting posts would be a ridiculous task, however, going forward into the 2010/2011 season it could be helpful. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Front Range
Posts: 9,175
|
No.
Too compartmentalized. Even is you did that it would become a junk show and a whole lot of people wouldn't find what they are looking for anyway. Then they'd just post their question over again anyway. I like your thought process, but this is going a little too extreme on the other side. If the search function ain't doing it for you, you can always start a thread and get beat up for it if the locals are feeling ornery. Of course I leave this to the locals. If it's something that is really demanded for, I can be persuaded to do this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Banff, Alberta
Posts: 1,107
|
Nah it's pretty good the way it is. To jonesy just ask the question. As long as you are not asking what does a snowboard look like you will get a good reception. I have asked some noobish questions in there and everyone is always pretty patient. (Except BA!
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 4,499
|
I've been a part of many forums and I can tell you that this idea won't work. While it's good in theory, but if you get too many sub-forums things become chaotic. People don't know which forum a topic belongs in, posters are beating up on each other for posting in the incorrect forum, it's tough to find the info you're looking for, etc., etc.
We tried a similar setup in a forum I moderated and it just didn't work. What we found was that a few of the sub-forums dominated with the majority of posts and the rest were pretty much abandoned. Ultimately the community will tell you how your forum structure needs to be setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,212
|
I'm sorry, this phrase completely dumbfounds me. I see it being stated more and more each day. Here's my question about that phrase:
When you guys use that statement, are you actually meaning that you RESENT that remark or just jokingly conceding to it? Sorry, grammar fascinates me
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|