Board comparison? k2 www rocker, Nitro Sub Pop, Bataleon Airobic - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-05-2009, 02:45 AM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CNY
Posts: 685
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Board comparison? k2 www rocker, Nitro Sub Pop, Bataleon Airobic

I'd be interested to read how these boards compare against one another. Has anyone ridden at least two out of the three?
phile00 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-05-2009, 03:28 AM
Veteran Member
 
jmacphee9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
ive ridin a k2 www no rocker and a bataleon airobic. they are both very comparable, the main difference is obviously the TBT. they are very close though except you can size down more on the k2, and the airobic is a little softer. if i had to pick i would say airobic but both will do the job. the airobic really suprised me with how stable it was on boxes and rails

Lib Tech Skate banana
Flow NXT-FS
Nike kaiju
Burton [ak] 2l Cyclic Jacket
Holden Northfield 3L pants
jmacphee9 is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-05-2009, 10:38 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CNY
Posts: 685
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmacphee9 View Post
ive ridin a k2 www no rocker and a bataleon airobic. they are both very comparable, the main difference is obviously the TBT. they are very close though except you can size down more on the k2, and the airobic is a little softer. if i had to pick i would say airobic but both will do the job. the airobic really suprised me with how stable it was on boxes and rails
I'd like to see a reviewer do a shootout between all the rocker boards. I'm surprised no one has done that since they're all the rage this year.
phile00 is offline  
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-06-2009, 12:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i've seen a couple of reviews on rocker boards. the ones that i've seen pretty much say that the TBT is the best
shredder07 is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-06-2009, 02:13 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hah, coincidentally I rode next year's version of all 3 at the Stratton demo days for shop employees this week and this is strictly MY impression of them. For the record I'm 5'9 and weigh 150. Rode the k2 www rocker in a 148 and absolutely loved it (for what it was). Super buttery fun mess around jib board that is cool because you can ride short 'cuz of a longer effective edge, would definately get it to add to a quiver. (Know I'm gonna get a lot of disagreers with this but) absolutely hated the bataleon airobic (151). Didn't think it was lively at all, didn't impress me on grommers, rails, buttering or anything at all. The nitro sub-pop definately impressed me the most. I rode the 148 and it was an amazing combo of soft but REALLY stable for a soft 148, probably because it comes back to camber towards the tip and tail. Still really fun to butter on, hit rails with, and hit small to mid-size kickers. Out of these 3 I would definately recommend the sub pop, its an awesome jibby board that still has a little pop and stability.
Holmes is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-06-2009, 11:27 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CNY
Posts: 685
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holmes View Post
Hah, coincidentally I rode next year's version of all 3 at the Stratton demo days for shop employees this week and this is strictly MY impression of them. For the record I'm 5'9 and weigh 150. Rode the k2 www rocker in a 148 and absolutely loved it (for what it was). Super buttery fun mess around jib board that is cool because you can ride short 'cuz of a longer effective edge, would definately get it to add to a quiver. (Know I'm gonna get a lot of disagreers with this but) absolutely hated the bataleon airobic (151). Didn't think it was lively at all, didn't impress me on grommers, rails, buttering or anything at all. The nitro sub-pop definately impressed me the most. I rode the 148 and it was an amazing combo of soft but REALLY stable for a soft 148, probably because it comes back to camber towards the tip and tail. Still really fun to butter on, hit rails with, and hit small to mid-size kickers. Out of these 3 I would definately recommend the sub pop, its an awesome jibby board that still has a little pop and stability.
This is exactly what I was looking for. Great review, man. So you think the Sub Pop was MORE poppy than the k2 www rocker? Because when I checked the k2 website, they made it out to be a very poppy board. Also, would you consider the k2 stiffer than the Sub Pop?
phile00 is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-07-2009, 02:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phile00 View Post
Because when I checked the k2 website...
Product websites are all propaganda. The only info I trust from sites are spec sheets.
markee is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-07-2009, 02:53 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CNY
Posts: 685
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Can't argue with you there. It is all mostly marketing BS
phile00 is offline  
post #9 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-08-2009, 01:34 AM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,399
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
I've ridden a regular WWW and have a SubPop. I like the SubPop better. Its more stable than my Scaremaster but super soft. I have a lengthy review on it in this thread.

And it doesn't return to camber. It just looks like that when you look down the edge. I thought it did too when I was looking at it in the shop. What its doing is the edge is curling back down. between and under the bindings the base is convex and it flattens out in the nose and tail. Other than that the shape is basically B-tech. Although the curling down edge gives a mildly resembling feeling to Recamber.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome