Review: Oakley Crash Pant - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 03-13-2008, 10:21 AM
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Review: Oakley Crash Pant

I bought the Oakley Crash snowboarding pant off of BackCountry for $62 shipped two day. The arrived and I immediately put them on and went out to shovel. First thing I noticed was how cold I got. Go figure because the pants have no insulation. I threw on a base layer and went back outside. I was warm and the wind didn't penetrate the pants. The first snowboarding experience with the pants was good. I didn't get wet, but then again I didn't spend much time sitting in the snow. Second trip was the real test. It was sleeting all day so it was a great test for the pants water resistance. Sitting on the lift I saw water building up on the pants, I brushed it off, and it never penetrated the pants.

Oakley Crash Pant
Water rating: 10000
Breathable rating: 10000
Size: Large
I'm 5'10", 195 lbs, 34"/35" waist, 32" inseam, and these pants fit perfect.

You will likely never get wet underneath these pants.
Inner thigh leg vents
Lift pass clip
Fleece lined pockets
Adjustable waist
Couldn't beat the price

No insulation
Could use some additional pockets

If you want great waterproof protection, get something with at least 10000 rating. I was dry all day long where my wife was soaked by the end of the day. The pants are baggy fit, but could use some additional pockets. The Oakley Timber pant addresses both these with additional pockets and some insulation. The Crash pant is fine with a base layer underneath as it kept me warm when the outside temp was in the teens. Had it been colder a mid-to-heavy weight base layer would be necessary.

Great experience with BackCountry. Never would have paid the MSRP $190 for these pants, but at $55 + shipping it's hard to beat the waterproof and breathability of these pants. Oakley makes a great product, although they up the price because of their name.
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 03-13-2008, 10:55 AM
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
so is that a yes or no on whether or not to buy them?
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 03-13-2008, 11:56 AM
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
For $55 I'd buy them again and again. The money you save you can buy a decent base layer to counter act the lack of insulation. If they were $100 it would be pushing it with the deals on S&C/WM for 10000/10000 pants that keep showing up.
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 03-14-2008, 05:52 PM
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
haha sweet.. good thinkin..

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome