Sizing up - rocker/hybrid - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-07-2014, 05:44 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Sizing up - rocker/hybrid

What's your take, is it better to size up on these profiles? Size down? Properly size?

I'm considering going full rocker or CRC, just wondering what most are doing on these profiles and what they are experiencing.

I'm thinking sizing up would help gain a few cm of edge I'd lose with the lifted tips, but would that defeat the whole purpose of rocker?
ItchEtrigR is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-07-2014, 06:08 PM
Veteran Member
 
Manicmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 742
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
I went from a cambered Palmer Proto to a NS Cobra hybrid rocker of the same length. I don't feel I've lost any control on groomed runs and it's a billion times better in the pow!

What sort of riding are you wanting this board for?
Manicmouse is offline  
post #3 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-07-2014, 06:24 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
td.1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: mtl, qc
Posts: 248
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
just pull up the specs of whatever boards you're looking at and compare the 'edge contact lengths'. it's not an exact science but it gives you a pretty good idea. I don't think it's going to change based on the profile, but it might change depending on how the nose/tail is designed.
td.1000 is offline  
post #4 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-07-2014, 07:36 PM
Senior Member
 
AntipodeanSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItchEtrigR View Post
What's your take, is it better to size up on these profiles? Size down? Properly size?

I'm considering going full rocker or CRC, just wondering what most are doing on these profiles and what they are experiencing.

I'm thinking sizing up would help gain a few cm of edge I'd lose with the lifted tips, but would that defeat the whole purpose of rocker?
What are you wanting to use it for? If you want the same control at high speeds etc. then yeah size up looking at edge contact compared with current board. But I assume you are changing profile for a reason? If so then stick with same size and enjoy the changes.
AntipodeanSam is offline  
post #5 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-07-2014, 08:59 PM
Veteran Member
 
Steezus Christ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 545
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
just stick to proper sizing. i dont know where this whole idea of riding rockered boards means you can down size came from.. of course it all depends on what your riding but for the most part, boards are designed to be ridden the way they are ridden and thats by riding the proper size.
Steezus Christ is offline  
post #6 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-07-2014, 09:05 PM
Veteran Member
 
24WERD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
generally speaking in most cases you size down.

Most Reverse camber boards have some type of edge control that gives it grip and stability.

Another is the tech is different then before as you can stiffen a board with carbon, graphite and other tech junk, as before it was just wood and stiffness was determine by the length of the wood.

At the end of the day it all depends on the board, model, yr, spec and shape of the board and how you use it.
24WERD is offline  
post #7 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-07-2014, 09:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Rcr= run longer since contact points are brought in from the rocker
Crc= run shorter since contact points are further out from the camber
16gkid is offline  
post #8 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-08-2014, 06:11 AM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
It'll be my first time on a full rockered or hybrid, haven't figured out what I'm going for but so far it's between a Process or Custom flying v and a Flow Era, Drifter or some other ones as I come across a sale or used. What I do know is I want a overall full rockered shape or rocker between the bindings, the more exaggerated the rocker the better.

I'm just trying to figure out what size & flex I want. I'm on a smaller 154 stiffer cambered deck, but at my weight (84kg) my sweet spot is anywhere from 157 to 162.
ItchEtrigR is offline  
post #9 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-08-2014, 07:13 AM
Veteran Member
 
ridinbend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bend
Posts: 3,293
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItchEtrigR View Post
It'll be my first time on a full rockered or hybrid, haven't figured out what I'm going for but so far it's between a Process or Custom flying v and a Flow Era, Drifter or some other ones as I come across a sale or used. What I do know is I want a overall full rockered shape or rocker between the bindings, the more exaggerated the rocker the better.

I'm just trying to figure out what size & flex I want. I'm on a smaller 154 stiffer cambered deck, but at my weight (84kg) my sweet spot is anywhere from 157 to 162.
Do you ride powder much? Do you want speed? Carving at all on groomed runs? Off piste chunder or more natural features in soft snow? All these different things will determine what you want. Full rocker is a bumpy ride as the is nothing to dampen the bumps that is if your not riding groomed trails.
ridinbend is online now  
post #10 of 21 (permalink) Old 05-08-2014, 09:23 AM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ridinbend View Post
Do you ride powder much? Do you want speed? Carving at all on groomed runs? Off piste chunder or more natural features in soft snow? All these different things will determine what you want. Full rocker is a bumpy ride as the is nothing to dampen the bumps that is if your not riding groomed trails.
My main concern is of course edge hold which is why I'm thinking sizing up (160+) might be something to consider. I'm not all speed and a hard line pencil thin carve is of less important to me than an ollie off a roller or sliding a box. It's nice however to know it's there if I pay attention to it.
ItchEtrigR is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome