Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lisevolution
It's true with Moore, at least he does try to show the opposing side of things, maybe not as ethically as I'd like but he does at least give the opposition a voice. I just hate when people take his word for gospel when they don't realize they were just programmed to see that side of it
|
i would like to think that what serves as a guideline to his presentation, is the level of extremism indulged in by those he would oppose.
moore is afterall a product of a nation who has perpetuated a state of war since its inception. occasionally these have been for a 'greater good' but even then, we know that the primary motive was a big fat pay day.
if that is the extent of what he would wish to oppose, then it would require an equally as extreme stance to the opposite, to realise a more moderate 'middle ground'.
this being said, the main objection to Moore is his success. despite the hippie traits people might conclude i entertain, i never like michael moore. i thought his TV show
TV Nation was complete tripe; a bunch of self satisfying smug clips of sarcasm....
meanwhile, a london geezer called Mark Thomas was rocking! and was genuinely a funny fella!
Mark Thomas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia