Top Speeds true or false? - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2012, 11:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
SnowMotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 224
Talking Top Speeds true or false?

With all the smart phones and apps out there everyone is getting there top speed. But I feel some people are looking a kph instead of mph b/c I have heard some people throw around speeds in the 60's. My top speed at 6'1 230lbs on an icy east coast trail was 57.5 mph. I thought that was fast untill someone half my size said they hit 63mph. So if you know your real mph top speed share it and let's have a online race. Honor system remember your only cheating yourself...HA
SnowMotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-04-2012, 11:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Banned!
 
snowklinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: L-Town
Posts: 4,764
Default

theres a 5000 page post on this thats only like a week old.

check it out/search function/me lazy
__________________
Support Local Business
"Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart!" - Ash
snowklinger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 12:05 AM   #3 (permalink)
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,427
Default

Lol last GPS track said my top speed was 1900 km/h... I love my GPS tracking software (trekbuddy stores .gpx files that I upload to garmin connect), but it has to be taken with a grain of salt. Pretty much every day I'm on the slopes I have a few corrected peaks in the 70-80 km/h range, but I don't consider it valid unless it shows a steady speed instead of just a peak.

Besides, I'm way more interested in seeing where I went on the hill, and looking at my total mileage and vert.

I wouldn't worry so much about top speed. I'm not running gates on my board (anymore) so it doesn't really matter... At the end of the day it's how dead I feel and how big the smile is on my face.
poutanen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 06:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
AAA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 387
Default

I've tried using a handheld GPS that gave real time speed, but didn't record top speed (ie; you had to look at it on the fly). It seemed to give consistent readouts. As I recall, consistent reads were; carving a green run : 27 mph (easy to watch the GPS), carving a blue : 37 mph (harder to take eyes off run to see GPS), carving a black : 47 mph (could barely spare a glance at that speed), faster parts of the black : ?? (couldn't spare a second to look).

It matches dead on with a car's speedometer, too. Seems accurate on a plane, too. Pretty cool to see exactly where you are flying over...at 40,000 feet and 540 mph.
AAA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 07:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
hikeswithdogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Minnesota Summer--Utah Winter
Posts: 967
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Ski tracks seems to be pretty accurate\conservative in it's readings.
__________________
makingfreshtracks.blogspot.com
hikeswithdogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 09:17 PM   #6 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
sabatoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 1,947
Default

Some science minded guy is going to comment about how your size and weight don't matter when it comes to speed. Board length and wax matter more.


/6'2" 250 lbs, 46mph
__________________
'12 NS Legacy 163
Days on snow 2013/2014 season:
  • Boyne Highlands: 14
  • Boyne Mountain: 1
  • Mt Holly: 1
  • Mt. Brighton: 1
  • Caberfae Peaks: 1
  • Crystal Mountain: 2
  • Bittersweet: 1
sabatoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 09:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
PanHandler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rathdrum, ID
Posts: 590
Default

Size and weigh definitely matter more than anything.

Roll a boulder and a pebble down a hill at the same time and see which one gets to the bottom first.
PanHandler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 09:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
sabatoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 1,947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PanHandler View Post
Size and weigh definitely matter more than anything.

Roll a boulder and a pebble down a hill at the same time and see which one gets to the bottom first.
hmm, I wonder what the factors are. Drop them from the same level and they fall at the same rate.
__________________
'12 NS Legacy 163
Days on snow 2013/2014 season:
  • Boyne Highlands: 14
  • Boyne Mountain: 1
  • Mt Holly: 1
  • Mt. Brighton: 1
  • Caberfae Peaks: 1
  • Crystal Mountain: 2
  • Bittersweet: 1
sabatoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 10:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
Official SBF Blogger
 
david_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 3,395
Blog Entries: 5
Default

I'm not a physicist but I'd wager a gentleman's bet that a rider's weight is really not very significant; most of us can "point it" and straightline conditions that would destroy a novice rider no matter his size. Board length, snow conditions, wax, rider ability, etc., are probably all more meaningful than weight/mass.

Also, I have heard that these handheld GPS and especially the apps in your smartphone really don't provide an accurate measure of speed in three dimensions; that is, they perform reasonably accurate while tracking your vehicle speed on a (relatively) flat surface street or highway, but once you put yourself on the snowboard at a 30- or 40-degree incline its nowhere near as reliable.

Case in point I saw someone say their crazy friend hit like 73mph on a Never Summer Evo. I call bullshit on that. 73mph is approaching olympic GS speed (~80 mph) there is no way anyone on this forum is doing that on an Evo. So, take these speed things with a grain of salt.
__________________

Repping the world's smallest mountains... 2013-2014 snow days: 48

Mt. Brighton - 13
Hawk Island - 6
Mt. Holly - 5
Mt. Bohemia - 3
Mt. Tolle - 3
Boyne Mountain - 2
Pine Knob - 2
Crystal Mountain - 2
Treetops - 2
Alpine Valley - 2
Caberfae Peaks - 2
Cannonsburg - 1
Urban - 1
Slackcountry - 1
Nub's Nob - 1
Sugar Mountain, NC - 1
Beech Mountain, NC - 1
david_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 10:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
Official SBF Blogger
 
david_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 3,395
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sabatoa View Post
hmm, I wonder what the factors are. Drop them from the same level and they fall at the same rate.
This is only true in a vacuum but I still don't think that the pebble/boulder thing is a good comparison.
__________________

Repping the world's smallest mountains... 2013-2014 snow days: 48

Mt. Brighton - 13
Hawk Island - 6
Mt. Holly - 5
Mt. Bohemia - 3
Mt. Tolle - 3
Boyne Mountain - 2
Pine Knob - 2
Crystal Mountain - 2
Treetops - 2
Alpine Valley - 2
Caberfae Peaks - 2
Cannonsburg - 1
Urban - 1
Slackcountry - 1
Nub's Nob - 1
Sugar Mountain, NC - 1
Beech Mountain, NC - 1
david_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums