Why don't companies publish equipment weight? - Page 3 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2013, 10:26 PM   #21 (permalink)
Drunk with power...er beer.
 
Donutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 4,716
Blog Entries: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorpedoVegas View Post
Have you ever picked up 2 large pieces of wood that were the same size but had the exact same weight? If snowboards were made of composite materials (like bikes) then It would be easy to publish accurate weights, but I think anything with a wood core is going to vary too much from board to board when they are being produced, much like 2 of the same guitars can vary quite a bit in actual weight, because that's what happens when you make things out of natural products. That would be my guess as to why you don't see weights listed for snowboards.
Very good argument. However, I would expect a good snowboard company to try to match up materials to keep the average weights within a narrow range, if for no other reason than the strength of the wood probably varies directly with the weight. You don't want to put out a battleship and a barkskin canoe under the same model name.
__________________

INNUENDO:
Italian enema.
Donutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-22-2013, 01:46 AM   #22 (permalink)
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,699
Default

I frequently measure boards I buy or get my hands on... Some pics relative to this thread... All weights are in grams.

2012 Burton Custom 156


2011 Burton T7 159


2012 Burton Custom EST Bindings (Medium)


2010 Burton C60 EST Bindings (Medium)
poutanen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 01:58 AM   #23 (permalink)
Banned!
 
snowklinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: L-Town
Posts: 5,294
Default

seriously? this thread is about 3 pages too long.

I'm glad you guys all care about how much your gear weighs. I must have been missing something today when I was hiking the ridge and dropping into untouched steeps and not thinking about that shit at all. I'm headed back in the morning for more of the same I doubt I'll even remember to laugh about this post.

Keep up the good work internet.



sorry I'm such an asshole, I love you all, but the weight of your gear is stupid to my stupid mind so there.
__________________
Support Local Business
"Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart!" - Ash
snowklinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 02:02 AM   #24 (permalink)
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowklinger View Post
I'm glad you guys all care about how much your gear weighs.

More of a curiosity thing for me. I just put the heavy C60s in place of the Customs on that blue board.
poutanen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 02:04 AM   #25 (permalink)
Banned!
 
snowklinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: L-Town
Posts: 5,294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by poutanen View Post
More of a curiosity thing for me. I just put the heavy C60s in place of the Customs on that blue board.
That's why I put disclaimers in because I love you sir, but people who discuss weight as a selling point or anything beyond curiousity....

Stuff like this comes up every once in awhile and I take it as a personal responsibility to shit on it
__________________
Support Local Business
"Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart!" - Ash
snowklinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 02:13 AM   #26 (permalink)
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowklinger View Post
That's why I put disclaimers in because I love you sir, but people who discuss weight as a selling point or anything beyond curiousity....
One thing that's funny is my current board has FLP in the name which stands for "Fucking Light Project", and the board weighs more than the T7!!!
poutanen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 02:18 AM   #27 (permalink)
Banned!
 
snowklinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: L-Town
Posts: 5,294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by poutanen View Post
One thing that's funny is my current board has FLP in the name which stands for "Fucking Light Project", and the board weighs more than the T7!!!
Maybe because it was an LED prototype and weight had nothing to do with it? You should plug that fucker in, you'll be like "ohhhhh, now I get it..."
__________________
Support Local Business
"Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart!" - Ash
snowklinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 02:28 AM   #28 (permalink)
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowklinger View Post
Maybe because it was an LED prototype and weight had nothing to do with it? You should plug that fucker in, you'll be like "ohhhhh, now I get it..."
Wait wouldn't the fucking light be a bad neon animated sign outside a classy nudie bar?

Actually I'm still waiting to hit 88 MPH on this thing to see if my flux capacitor is working!!!

Edit: this thread needs some Al Bundy


Last edited by poutanen; 02-22-2013 at 02:33 AM.
poutanen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 05:27 AM   #29 (permalink)
Resident poet
 
wrathfuldeity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bham
Posts: 4,188
Default

it doesn't matter. split bindings post their weight. there are times there is more snow and ice on the board

actually the older I get the less it matters....how far in the parking lot, how much the board weighs, how far the hike is, how many laps...perhaps I'm just happy to still be riding.
__________________
wrathfuldeity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2013, 07:54 AM   #30 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
john doe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,402
Default

Here's the real answer. Companies don't post weights because they have nothing to gain from it. In fact they stand to lose a lot from it. Companies posting weights would result in a weight war. Right now they have the freedom to design a product that performs and is durable. If they have to make stuff lighter then it will break more often and warranty claims go up. You also run into customers buying the wrong gear trying to save weight. Undersized boots, bindings, and boards would happen a lot.
__________________

2011 Smokin Buck Ferton 155
2013 Flow NX2-SE
2013 Flow Hylite boa
Burton Stagger pants/jacket
Smith I/O
john doe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums