Whats wrong with a 0,0 stance anyway? - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 02:25 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh and I 2nd trapper's question. Thats totally what I was curious about too!
EastCoastChris is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 02:29 PM
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
CassMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Whitefish MT
Posts: 2,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by linvillegorge View Post
A buddy of mine rides 0/-15. Yes, neutral in the front and ducked in the back.
maybe he should be riding the other stance, goofy vs regular? idk...whatever works for him i suppose
CassMT is offline  
post #13 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 02:35 PM
Member
 
glaucon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I started riding in the 0/0 days, and used that for a while. I soon transitioned to pushing the front foot forward to about 12 and used 12/0 for around 10 years because I felt more stable that way and felt I had more control. But it always felt a little awkward as being somewhat of an unnatural stance.

A few years ago I pushed the back foot to -6 and really liked it. I started riding switch this season and pushed the back foot to -12. So my current setup is 15/-12 and that really feels ideal for me.

But regardless of natural feel, I do think there are meaningful advantages to an angled setup (not necessarily duck, but using any angles). From a physics standpoint, you have more stability if your feet are angled. By the same token, you have more control. This is because your feet are responsive to, and can act in, two dimensions instead of one.

Take a look at this highly technical computer-aided drawing:



Clearly, the structure on the left (analogous to a 0/0 stance) is more susceptible to instability from a transverse force as shown since each foot only acts in one dimension in the plane of the board (generally speaking, along the axis of the board width via toe and heel pressure). On the other hand, the structure on the right (analogous to a duck stance) utilizes its trapezoidal shape to allow each foot to operate in two dimensions (both the width and the length of the board) and accordingly has more stability (think truss versus rectangle in building a bridge). Outputs from the feet in this position are similarly advantageous since they act in two dimensions. This useful when thinking about shifting weight fore and aft.

Of course this concept isn't exclusive to the duck stance. The idea is that stability increases with binding angle, wherever that angle is. Comfort, natural feel, and intended purpose are all other factors that play into how you'd set up your bindings.
glaucon is offline  
post #14 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 02:47 PM
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
CassMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Whitefish MT
Posts: 2,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
^^^ like

i ride 23/12, which i got used to way back cuz my sorels hung too far over, lol (can i get a....?)...but i have the highbacks pivoted so they are parallel to the edge...i can go on and on but it wont mean shyt to anyone else, haha
CassMT is offline  
post #15 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 02:57 PM
Veteran Member
 
NWBoarder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 2,056
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 10
When I learned to ride in the 90's 0,0 was pretty norm. I couldn't ride it though because I had way too much overhang at those angles. I ended up learning with a forward stance. Once i got my first wide board, I rode with a positive front foot, and 0 on the back. Now I ride 9,-9 and that's what's comfortable for me. When I first got back into boarding after a major hiatus I tired out 15,-15 but that was awkward and uncomfortable. Then I tried 12,-12 and that was a little better, but still not great. Then I went down to 9,-9 and that was the money spot for me. The point here is that there is no "correct" angle for snowboarding. The only "correct" angle, is the one that you are comfortable with.

Oh yeah!? Well, my mom says I'm cool!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clayton Bigsby View Post
It never gets old, if you're in it for the passion, and not the fashion
NWBoarder is offline  
post #16 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 06:38 PM
Veteran Member
 
AcroPhile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So why is the rental shop refusing to mount his bidings at 0,0 ?
AcroPhile is offline  
post #17 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 07:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would just ask will you get toe drag at 0-0?
Mine are ducked at 12 each. I've never tried it, but I think my toes would hang over too far at 0.
hvalley76 is offline  
post #18 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 07:56 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcroPhile View Post
So why is the rental shop refusing to mount his bidings at 0,0 ?
I'm actually female, 5'5" with a size 7.5 boot. No toe drag issues for me.

But yeah it was really wierd in general. This was my first trip to Northstar and
my first time on a board since like 2002. I rode a ton between 92 and 02. I told the guy that. A d I also asked for a board on the 148 range (I used to ride a 152, the first gen Rossi Recycler all mountain.) He a) insisted that I had to ride a soft, flat 138. and b.) That I couldnt ride with a 0,0 stance. I even strapped in and was like..whoa this feels wierd. I told him and he said 6,-6 is what we have to give beginners. So they was he was talking I thought it was some sort of safety issue. Looking back I think he was too lazy to switch the board out and/or adjust the stance. I was one of 3 people in there since I was out front at 7:30 waiting for them to open.
EastCoastChris is offline  
post #19 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 08:20 PM
Moderator
 
boarderaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,937
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastChris View Post
Is 0, 0 not the proper form for a squat? Thats how I have always done them anyway. Its supposed to reduce low back strain or something. I dont really know the mechanics of it. Yeah Whenwas when I started riding and 0, 0 was the default.
So its harder on the knees? It seems like the +12.+12 of a step in carver would be easier on the knees. I feel like riding duck makes it wierder to use your knees to enter a carve.
Anyone know the mechanics? I'm gonna ask my physiatrist.
The thing my trainers stresses about squats is not to have the knee's go over the toes. I have a tendency to rotate my knee's out a little bit when I do them, and I have noticed that if I don't, it HURTS.

I myself really like an obnoxious amount of duck when I snowboard since I notice my legs really like to rotate out.

As not common as 0,0 is, at the end of the day, you have to do what feels good to you.
boarderaholic is offline  
post #20 of 44 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 08:43 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
With squats, trainers normally recommend toes slightly out in a comfortable, natural position. This is because the goal of squatting is to be able to get good depth (hip crease parallel to the knees) while keeping the knees tracking in a safe, stable position (i.e. not caving inward, thigh parallel to or even outside of your feet).

Having your knees go "over" your toes (i.e. past your toes) is natural, especially if you're front squatting where the knees are in a much more forward position by necessity. The important part is to keep your weight on your heels so that they don't lift. Squatting from your toes is a recipe for disaster.

Again, the goal is to have flexibility for maximal depth and range of motion while also keeping the knees in a safe position. Some people have the ability to achieve this with the toes pointed straight forward (i.e. 0/0). This requires very good ankle flexibility, and even then, for many people it's much more natural for their toes to be pointed out a bit.
skunkworks_ is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome