![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 96
|
Just wondering how much reducing my stance with will help with 360s. I imagine the more important factors are form and technique but if reducing my stance width can significantly help me in learning them then I think it'd be beneficial to try.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NH
Posts: 3,112
|
I found that narrowing my stance actually hurt my spins...maybe just because I had to re-learn them that way. I went from 25" to 23.5" and it was too much of a change. I ended up going back to 24" . At first I couldnt generate the torque with and still feel that I don't get the pull I used to with a wider stance, but with a narrow stance it reduces the pain I had in my knees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 674
|
I've found...and remeber reading somewhere, that wider stances are better for spinning. And it makes sense to me...since you can generate torque due to mechanical advantage, much like gripping a tire iron at the ends. Of course too wide gives you less leg motion and is harder to balance this way.
I've found for myself, the alieviation of the wide stance pressuring knees problem can be solved simply by increasing the stance angle. I used to ride 0 0 for all mountain. When I switched to mostly spinning and freestyle, I went widest and 15 -15. This way, when I bend my legs and it's in more of an "angle" because of the wide stance, my feet are more aligned with my thighs...reducing that "axial twist pressure" on my knees. I imagine every body is different and wide to some is short for others and some ppl are more flexible and in certain postions, etc. too. But you can try what I did and see if it solves your knee problem. Last edited by rasmasyean; 12-28-2010 at 02:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 649
|
A narrower stance will make spinning in the air easier but like others said generating the rotational force during take off is more difficult. Whenever you compact your body as much as possible it results in less angular momentum meaning faster spins. Think about a figure skater spinning around, first with her arms out and then once she brings her arms in.
Isn't it also true that having a narrower stance helps with carving/holding an edge since you're applying force further away from the tip and tail meaning it's easier to flex the board? I always thought this was a good way to handle very stiff boards.
__________________
East Coast Park Rat 2008 Burton Twin 157 w/ Rome 390 Boss 2005 Burton Canyon 168 w/ Ride LS "its ppl like you, that I would "impact damage" your face if i ever saw you keep your mouth shut. one more time, please and thank you." -user: chingy_ |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 446
|
Quote:
On the 360 issue add pop to the butter maybe? Over a roller? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 649
|
Why do you think board sizes are so dependent on rider weight?
There's a good reason why skinny little 140lb kids don't buy 160+ cm boards
__________________
East Coast Park Rat 2008 Burton Twin 157 w/ Rome 390 Boss 2005 Burton Canyon 168 w/ Ride LS "its ppl like you, that I would "impact damage" your face if i ever saw you keep your mouth shut. one more time, please and thank you." -user: chingy_ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|