does rocker truly eliminate need for stance setback? - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 02-11-2012, 11:16 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Question does rocker truly eliminate need for stance setback?

Does rocker (versus traditional camber) truly eliminate the need for stance setback in deep/powder conditions?

ALso, how come some of Never Summer's rocker-camber boards still have stance setback?
hulupotatoe is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 02-11-2012, 11:40 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
david_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 3,685
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 6
doesn't necessarily "eliminate" the need but certainly mitigates the need for setback which really was to help you keep your nose from submarining. With a rocker/early-rise shape the board is going to do much of that for you, or will require a lot less effort on your part.
david_z is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 02-11-2012, 11:47 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Cool...that makes sense. So is there any advantage to stance setback for groomers, hardpack or the Ice Coast?

Also, is it true that some boards have progressive sidecuts that work best if you abide by the built-in setback?
hulupotatoe is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 02-11-2012, 11:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Where the Greatest Snow on Earth is (SLC).
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Also, rocker will allow you to float better with a shorter board, so you don't need to take a super long deck out on the deep days
bebop_monk is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 02-11-2012, 12:09 PM
Senior Member
 
HoboMaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hulupotatoe View Post
Cool...that makes sense. So is there any advantage to stance setback for groomers, hardpack or the Ice Coast?

Also, is it true that some boards have progressive sidecuts that work best if you abide by the built-in setback?
Yes and yes, for freeriding in general you always have some kind of setback (specially if your board is directional, IE the tip and tail are not the same).

I have a twin-tip board and actually use a slight setback because I prefer the way it rides (more dynamic).

PowderHound and TreeNinja
HoboMaster is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 02-11-2012, 08:39 PM
ETM
Veteran Member
 
ETM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Rocker helps but is definately no replacement for setback. Rocker helps by increasing your dynamic nose height, this is the actual height that the nose sits if you were to draw an imaginary straight line from binding to binding out past the nose.

Now say we have 2 boards exactly the same but one is camber and one is rocker, you strap in and stand on the board on flat ground and measure the nose height. The rocker board will be only slightly higher because the camber board is being pressed flat negating the downward effect that the camber has. Lets say the nose on the camber board measured 50mm high and the rocker board measured 55mm due to upward effect the rocker has.

Now with both boards unloaded (similar to how is is when riding deep powder) and the imaginary line from binding to binding out past the nose again you will see that the nose rocker board has lifted up even higher, it is now at 60mm nose height while the camber board has taken a nose dive and its nose height has been reduced to 40mm above the imaginary line.

So the rocker board has a 20mm advantage in dynamic nose height over the camber board in true pow conditions. If back at the factory they were to increase the nose height of the camber board by 20mm both these boards would have the same dynamic nose height and would exhibit the same float characteristics in deep powder snow.
ETM is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome