Scorpioned while flat basing and now I can't anymore - Page 16 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2013, 10:44 PM   #151 (permalink)
Deacon's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hudson, WI
Posts: 2,133

Originally Posted by neni View Post
this "to flatbase or not to flatbase" topic seems to hit a sensitive spot, kind of a religious thing... Anyway. I actually didn't want to resume the flatbase discussion but was interested if someone else does this "more weight on hind foot" at top speed.

BTW. Just cause one thinks it's reckless doesn't automatically mean that there's not someone out there who does so
No sensitivity here, just good humor.
Just like Cass, I put more weight forward on my camber the faster I go. I could see how a rocker might be more stable at a high speed leaning back some. Explains why I see all the park rats standing on their back leg when they're bombing hills.

Pirt near here!
Deacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-29-2013, 03:51 AM   #152 (permalink)
Senior Member
behi's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 142

Originally Posted by Snowolf View Post
In powder or on groom? If in powder, where and what was the moisture content?
Fresh powder that was run over by a groomer - groomed powder.

Off trail, the fastest I've done is around 50mph. Snow set for a few days, pretty dense, temperature a little below freezing.

My board planes really well; 33cm tip/tail width, 28.6cm waist. I often have not-so-steep powder mostly to myself, since everyone else is going too slow to have much fun...
behi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:36 PM   #153 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: WA
Posts: 743

Interesting description about the bowling ball balancing on the RC/C2 profile. That's what I was feeling. I remember like 8 years ago before my boarding hiatus, I only got out a few times, but I still had no feelings of instability "flat basing" and that was on a cambered deck.

With the C2, even though it's been said to keep weight forward, I still feel like weight back is more stable. I can't really reconcile this because "heavy end wants to go first" is logical, but it feels like shifting weight forward is when the squirrel kicks in.

I wonder if this is because putting the weight forward is actually centering it right over the middle rocker section, briefly causing you to lose both front and rear contact (or at least heavily unweight them). Maybe when I think my weight is forward, it's actually centered. Perhaps on these C2/RC decks, it would be reasonable to say:

Centered flatbase: Worst
Rear-heavy flatbase: Better, but not ideal
Front-heavy flatbase: Best

On a camber board, centered weight puts maximum engagement on both points, and even if you favor one or the other, the profile will naturally put some pressure on the other point. That would make it easier for beginners to do that.

On a full rocker...well who knows, all bets are off

That makes me curious about trying it on a C3 profile:

I haven't ridden a board like that, but I'm curious now. It would be nice to have the camber stability but I'm not sure I'd sacrifice it for float.
jtg is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums