![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't plan on doing park stuff. I want to do the trails you take the lifts to; I guess that would be in the piste and powder ratings in the Burton stuff?
I'm on the right-hand side in the picture below; brother is on left. I'm 66 inches tall (167cm) and it's about 144cm from the ground to the bottom of my chin, which is pretty much the height of the board. My brother is 72 inches tall (183cm). http://www.ravynx.net/img-lj/snowboa...9/IMG_3476.jpg Here's a somewhat-better shot of the board. I'm assuming that says 143 under the stomp pad? Not sure if that's the height or for something else. Been trying to figure out what my board length was. http://www.ravynx.net/img-lj/snowboa...9/IMG_3426.jpg Is this roughly about where your board should stand or should I have gotten a longer one? Didn't have much choice since they picked out that one for me based on the weight/height I gave them. |
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
So as far as weight is concerned, can you have a short board that's flexible and compare it to a longer board that's stiff if you want to vary the board length? Last edited by RavynX; 01-04-2007 at 11:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
THE OFF PHISTE WHORE
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CENTRAL COAST, CALI
Posts: 674
|
Burton Triumph 160
i would go with that one, it is the supermodle which they re-made again this year
__________________
"Beer is proof that God loves us and want us to be happy".
Benjamin Franklin |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|