Hi guys,I wanted to post my findings today after another day on these but unfortunately due to a late night change plan of one of my friends on the logistics (a new girl, he’s apparently not aware that such decisions are detrimental in a long run but whatever) I’ll miss my today’s shred.
Anyway, my take on my friend’s Surfari 157 (2018) and my new UNW8 159 (2020) at 85 kg, Adidas Tacticals ADV 10 US. Both with Katanas 2019, the ankle strap at the very top and a lot of forward lean. The binding angles + 24-18 / - 6 to -12.
The UNW8 in 159 (I sit at the top of the recommended weight) is still super stiff (but energetic), probably it will break in a bit but as for now I’d rate my UNW8s 159 2020 and 163 2019 as 9/10. I ride the 163 per reference stance, the 159 with a max setback (on reference I feel like the nose digs in/hooks too easily in the mix of slush and ice I’ve been exclusively riding for the past 3 weeks if I put too much weight on the front foot). They both rip super hard carves. The 159 is just more versatile with an 8-meter sidecut to dodge a Jerry while the 163 provides a better float in slush even without the setback and should have even better grip due to 4 cm longer effective edge (I haven’t felt it yet). I haven’t found a speed limit on either, it’s always me slowing down, not the board telling me to do so by chattering.
The Surfari 157 (biax glass) is softer. I’d give it 7/10 overall feel with a medium-stiff nose and a stiff tail.
They say it’s a camber with an early rise at the tips but it’s more of a back seat camber with plenty of rocker that starts just after the front binding.
Grips icy shit well (though the UNW8s do it even better) and is more user friendly due to the softer flex, especially torsionally. Obviously floats great in slush. You can charge hard but it has no problems with slowing down. It can wash out in a hard Euro if you don’t weight the tapered tail at the end of a carve but that’s on the rider. I’d say it feels semi locked-in, the UNW8 is a full lock-in to me. It has a nice rebound exiting the carve so you don’t have to work for that spring changing edges mid-air. For the flex reference I’d rate my Optimistic 154 2019 at my 85 kg as 7/10 as well (a bit stiffer tail than the Surfari in 157). I change to the Optimistic when it gets really crowded to carve around while keeping the float in slush. I can push it at the same time with its great grip. It’s my ’party’ board.
As the Pentaquark is also biax glass and similar weight to the Surfari (and lighter than the Unw8 for the same surface area) I think these two actually share more with each other than with the UNW8. If Amplid gave 8/10 stiffness to the Unw8 (triax and imo underrated flex) and 7/10 to the Surfari (biax, I agree with the flex), I’d expect the Pentaquark to actually sit in the middle, with the Unw8 being 9/10, the Penta 8/10 and the Surfari being 7/10.
So I’d say that the Surfari is a rad dad’s freeride board while I expect the Pentaquark to be a rad dad’s carving board. They must have left it biax for a reason while obviously their super stiff triax would be more appealing from the marketing’s point of view for that hefty 840 EUR price tag.
That’s my guess on the Penta but based on my experience with the two Centrifugals and @trpa_ec describing his previous model UNW8 (biax and lighter than mine) to be more comparable to what I feel riding the Surfari than my UNW8s.
very interesting discussion and thanks everyone for your insights and sharing your experience with the different Amplid boards. As per my other thread I’m looking at alternatives to my Custom X I’m for hard charging/carving and am actually contemplating to give Amplid a try.
I’m a bit confused though with the Amplid website vs experience here. If I understand correctly the general experience seems to be that the unw8 is an even stiffer, little less versatile board (at least models with triax) whereas the Pentaquark seems to be a more of an all mountain board. The website says the opposite would be the case...?
I couldn’t find the effective edge lengths for both boards on the Amplid website, does anyone know these by any chance?
I’m 187cm, 77kg and on a 10.5US Ion at the moment. I have a Custom X in 162 and despite being somewhat below the recommended weight range I love the fact that the board with effective edge of 125.5cm feels it’s running on rails. I have tried the 158 version yesterday and also loved the feel but more for the fact that it’s more manoeuvrable and quicker edge to edge. At high speeds however it’s no where near the stable feeling I have with the 162 (4cm less effective edge seem to make a huge difference).
i was hoping to get a good mix with one of the Amplid boards and based on the website would have said the Pentaquark as pure carving and bombing machine would be the better fit but after reading this thread I’m thinking maybe the unw8 would be better?
Although based on the running length the 159 unw8 seems to have a shorter effective edge than the Pentaquark 158. With my specs and reviews above would be hesitant to go with the 163 unw8 which however would have same running length as the 158 Pentaquark...
so many questions and sorry for the confusion but would be great to hear your thoughts!
cheers