Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums banner

Did I bought the right board? Lib Tech TRS 159 with US11/190lbs

3373 Views 21 Replies 12 Participants Last post by  vnebh
Bought myself a new TRS 159 with Cartel L bindings. But after the deal I started researching...(anybody recognize this :wink:). Hate myself for it!

Hard to say what my level is, as a holiday-cruser from NL, but I think I'm in between an intermediate and advanced rider. Usually ride groomers (blue/red/black) and get as much pow as I can get (depends on the weather in de Alps). I do like a playful board so I can do/try some buttering and get some natural jumps on the slopes. Don't do much park and a 360 is my top game. Got around 6 years of experience with 10 days a year; but do learn fast)

weight: 190-195lbs (88kg)
boots: size 11US (with my Burton shrinkage 10US)
height: 6' 2" (188cm)

At the moment I've been riding a Ride Machete '12 155 with a 247 waist and Union Force bindings (for 3 years). The Guy in the shop adviced me this short board and said I could faster learn some tricks, as a leaned more towards the park at the time. But broke my back few years ago in the park and my girlfriend usually only rides groomers, so I don't find myself in the park very often. They guy was prob right at the time, but now I get some wash-outs when carving. And my top speed with this short board is kinda low with 45mph compared to my order (camber 160W) board with almost 60mph.

Current riding style: I do like to ride groomers fast, do some small tricks and ride pow when I can. Don't ride switch often, but want to be able to.

What do you think; did I buy the right board (TRS 159)? My concerns:
- Still a bit narrow for my feet with only 25.3 waist
- I don't ride in Icy conditions often (French Alps); do I need this Magne traction and does is bother?
- No Sinthered base

Should i doubt my buy? And will it be significantly different than my Ride? What do you guys/girls think?

Other boards that come to mind (all-mountain freestyle with mid-flex):
- Jones (Ultra) Mountain twin 160 25.6 waist
- Never Summer proto 160 25.5waist
- Never Summer Snowtrooper 162 25.6 waist
- Rome Agent Rocker (does not really come in the right size, as I don't want the Wide with 26+ waist); does fit my criteria though

Pls help my out of my misery 0:)

[ included a picture of my TRS 159 with Cartel L bindings and Burton Hail US11 boots ]

Attachments

See less See more
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Great set up, now go enjoy it. No more doubts.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
6'2" with a 159, should have gone with something around 162-163 26.1 waist. I'm 6'1" and don't ride anything less then my 160 Fish, but most other non-setback boards I ride are 161-163
6'2" with a 159, should have gone with something around 162-163 26.1 waist. I'm 6'1" and don't ride anything less then my 160 Fish, but most other non-setback boards I ride are 161-163
A board can't tell how tall you are, but it sure as hell knows how heavy you are.

OP, you'll be fine, and it'll be a huge improvement over your 155 machete. Go ride and enjoy!
  • Like
Reactions: 5
A board can't tell how tall you are, but it sure as hell knows how heavy you are.
Concur with this, buying a board based on height is old school thinking. I'm 6'6" and 225 and have everything in my quiver from a 162 to a 170. You'll be more than fine with that setup. I'm a big fan of the cartels, its the only binding I use these days.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Great set up, now go enjoy it. No more doubts.
A board can't tell how tall you are, but it sure as hell knows how heavy you are.

OP, you'll be fine, and it'll be a huge improvement over your 155 machete. Go ride and enjoy!
^ What those guys said. Could have maybe gone up 1 size for groomer bombing, but this is great set-up - and perfect for working on your tricks.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I am basically your size, just a couple cm shorter (183), and i ride (15/-15), i also mostly ride in France (even going to Les Arcs in 2.5 weeks)...
I have the LibTech Attack Banana 159 (which is not much different than the TRS, the TRS is a bit more aggressive) with Burton Cartels, and i can say it is a great board and great bindings.
The magne traction is nice even on snowy groomers and in no way it should bother you, on the contrary it helps with the hold on high speeds (i ride at about 50mph).
Anyone, go worries free and enjoy this great setup bro :)
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Usually, I'd say you don't need magnetraction for our generally soft snow in the Alps. On contrary, the magne will drag in soft snow and slow you down when carving. Usually. But right at the moment with the lack of fresh snow for weeks, also here we have only manmade re-frozen hardpack/ice/concrete to ride, so ATM, you'd be happy with the added edgehold :). Give and take...

Size wise it's also a give and take... 159 for your weight is rather on the short side for carving at speed where more edge is an advantage, but as the guys already mentioned, for exercising tricks, smaller is easier. You can't optimize on both. Decide, on which part you want to optimize and be happy with it :). If you want to optimize both? Get a second board :happy:
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Bought myself a new TRS 159 with Cartel L bindings. But after the deal I started researching...(anybody recognize this :wink:). Hate myself for it!

...
What do you think; did I buy the right board (TRS 159)? My concerns:
- Still a bit narrow for my feet with only 25.3 waist
- I don't ride in Icy conditions often (French Alps); do I need this Magne traction and does is bother?
- No Sinthered base

Should i doubt my buy? And will it be significantly different than my Ride? What do you guys/girls think?
I think you should have gone a bit longer into the 160-164, maybe a tad wider and mid stiff CAMBERED twin/directional twin, non mag or half mag. A board as such this might force you to up your skills.

you don't need mag
if you like to blast, you need cambered
and if you don't have more than 20-25 cm of pow you can do fine on a cambered instead of rockered in the middle.
Thats a great setup man, im 180-185 lbs size 11 boot and i have a 157 TRS, i love it, sure its not gonna be the absolute fastest deck, but its stable at speed, and still playful. Stop having buyer remorse and go ride this beauty.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
3
Thanks guys/girs for your quick words and advice.

I'll keep the board since its prob the best mix between playful and stil good for fast rides on the groomers and a bit of pow (MAX 2ft).

I find it important that it'll be an improvement over my machete :). I'll share my experiences with it when i return from the mountains.

As I also like to contribute to this forum, I shared some pics of the Cartel L bindings on the board. Do you think this is well centered? Would have liked it a bit more towards the toes, but there are only three holes to center...

Attachments

See less See more
An old thread but I must say I finally found the feedback I was looking for.
Currently shopping with TRS being the number one pick (new but -2 yrs at a great $$)
But had my doubts based on experience level and all this talk about CRC xc2btx being for more advanced rider styles. lots of talk about going RCR for a rider of an intermidiate level.

looking up reviews is a mine field where all i find myself doing is second guessing.

Id love to here how the TRS went
But had my doubts based on experience level and all this talk about CRC xc2btx being for more advanced rider styles. lots of talk about going RCR for a rider of an intermidiate level.
This is crap. Whomever you heard that from is wrong.
Good to here (I assume thats another vote to go forward with my purchase lol) i am of a slightly lower level to the original poster but from their description feels very close

I thinks I have found out why another forum pushes RCR - turns out they also have an online store mostly stocking yes boards which are RCR. more for a advertising camp rather than a useful soure of info.
did some further browsing and no matter the situation the feedback from
(this forms most active member is "you should try RCR its better for you have you heard of YES and model")
But had my doubts based on experience level and all this talk about CRC xc2btx being for more advanced rider styles. lots of talk about going RCR for a rider of an intermidiate level.
This is crap. Whomever you heard that from is wrong.
Agreed. That is a ridiculous statement.
Everyone has their preferences. I know the forum/store you're referring to, there's a lot of good knowledge there and they back their products. Personally for Aus/NZ conditions, I much prefer RCR. Any hard/icy snow I'd choose RCR, slush I'm happy with either. YES also have a lifetime warranty. If you can get the TRS cheap snap it up, but if prices are similar I'd go YES and RCR anyday.
I understand your concern at the potential conflict of interest in recommending Yes boards and RCR, but the advice seems sound to me.

I have no personal experience with Yes boards, but what I have heard is nearly universally positive.

Regarding the RCR profile, I feel like generally it's the best profile around for relatively serious riders doing all mountain freestyle. It handles everything from ice to powder fairly well and gives you most of that predictable camber stability and power while being slightly more forgiving.

Don't get me wrong, any of the Never Summer ripsaw profile boards or the Nitro Team Gullwing are CRC boards that also rip, but there is a reason why the RCR profile is increasingly popular for mid to high end boards.
The ripsaw profile (on paper) and take this comment with a grain of salt for that reason seems very similar to the lib CRC profile XC2BTX (yes i hate myself for using the jargon)

agressive rocker in the middle with extended camber to the outs - is this not the case

Very difficult to demo boards in aus its a 1 day a yr thing at least for the public. im sure staff on the mountain have better access

so im basically stuck with staring at profiles at the shop lol. ive had like 3 runs on CRC and half a run on RCR both ok but couldnt really tell much from a 60 second groomer
What sizes are you looking at? What's your weight/boot size? I couldn't find many good deals on Lib/CRC boards, but quite a few decent deals on YES or other RCR boards.
boot 8.5 weight 63-5 KG (140pounds)
Board size 148 will go to 150 would prefer a further down size
Note TRS in current model does not fit. looking at a late 2014 release 148 standard width <$500AUD.

To be honest price is not too concerning (happy to go to to the $600 mark for the right board even though I am leaning this way based on what I think is bang for buck)
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top