Possibly dumb question but...
I have a ride shadowban, a directional twin with some setback (10mm i think), and a ref stance that is a bit too wide. I use burton re-flex bindings which is just a few holes in the disk, not a channel. if i want to move the stance tighter, is it better to move the front back on the insert pack, making the board more directional, or back up, making it more twin, or overthinking entirely?
this is more out of curiousity and how it affects performance, thinking the sidecut and ref stance were designed to work together, and does moving the back forward change the grip /turning dynamics out of the tail, or similar differences with the front bindings back? had a few days on it at the end of last season and moved the back forward, worked fine but back end felt more lose vs when i tried it at ref.
I have a ride shadowban, a directional twin with some setback (10mm i think), and a ref stance that is a bit too wide. I use burton re-flex bindings which is just a few holes in the disk, not a channel. if i want to move the stance tighter, is it better to move the front back on the insert pack, making the board more directional, or back up, making it more twin, or overthinking entirely?
this is more out of curiousity and how it affects performance, thinking the sidecut and ref stance were designed to work together, and does moving the back forward change the grip /turning dynamics out of the tail, or similar differences with the front bindings back? had a few days on it at the end of last season and moved the back forward, worked fine but back end felt more lose vs when i tried it at ref.
