Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums banner

FASE | Fast Entry Snowboard Binding System

2 reading
42K views 348 replies 58 participants last post by  NT.Thunder  
#1 ·

Not gonna lie, this may be what gets me into step-in bindings. The brand support is insane, footprint looks small.
 
#4 · (Edited)
I'm unclear on the mechanics of this. It loos like the highback can be tilted back (Jeremy Jones picture) coupled with really long two-strap ladders. Does this mean you step in, pull up the back, and then pull down the straps?

Edit: I should have watched more of the top video before scrolling down. It's basically a Supermatic but instead of the highback pulling the straps down, you manually control the top strap for in/out. This also makes it easer to fold down the highback since the top strap can be super wide open, yet still engaged. Unlike a Supermatic, you have to pull the highback backwards before entry.
 
#7 ·
It's basically a Supermatic but instead of the highback pulling the straps down, you manually control the top strap for in/out. This also makes it easer to fold down the highback since the top strap can be super wide open, yet still engaged. Unlike a Supermatic, you have to pull the highback backwards before entry.
The press materials has this quote, describing the actions:
To get in, simply insert your boot into the binding, the AutoBack (highback) automatcally closes around your boot while the Locked-In Toe Strap remains in place. Then simply buckle the FastStrap (ankle strap) with one hand to the preferred tension like you normally would.

To get out, simply open the FastStrap then lift your heel, the AutoBack naturally opens to release your boot. That’s it! The main feature is the AutoBack (highback) which automatically closes around the boot. This innovative design is built around the pedal, a pressure sensitve lever that raises the highback to the boot when strapping-in and opens the highback when the rider disengages as they are unstrapping.
I'm still not clear on how the highback can move both backwards to open and also fold down. Hopefully we'll see more videos as it becomes more public.
 
#8 ·
Only watched had a quick look front page. If this can be implimented on all binding models with a "traditional highback", without chageing feel and reliability, that would be cool. Hopefully it would also standardize parts between brands making it easier than ever creating your perfect franken-binding.
 
#9 ·
Nidecker group rollout at the moment but I believe they are interested in licensing out to any one that wants to adopt. They are licensing Supermatic so I'd be shocked if they didn't license FASE. I have had a chat with some inside people about it, and it's legit. There is a slight weight penalty of about 100g/binding for the Rome/Bataleon offering. The Jones/32 is the same frame, different straps/highback. No skate tech on the Jones. What really lit the bulb for me is the cat track scenario; step out to skate, back in if you need to make a couple turns even without touching the ankle strap, back out to skate, back in and strap in, and do it all pretty seamless.

I'm still over here hoping they don't forget about the original quick entry, Flow. Now that the incorrect stigmas of "quick entry = less performance" or "quick entry = not cool" are hopefully over with they can gain some market share back as they are STILL the only brand that makes life just a bit easier, AND increases performance. These other solutions don't change performance for the better.
 
#19 ·
That’s kinda that way I’m at looking at specifically for me (I dont see an advantage for me with any of these as strapping in is not a problem that I’m looking for a solution).
However, I see this as a fantastic thing because the market gets a more true two strap option in this fast entry (? Or whatever it is) category of bindings. It’s better that the market has this in competition with the others. Nidecker has the funds to push this as well. E.G., burton isn’t the only player and that’s a good thing.
 
#34 ·
I got to mess around with these recently.
The system works and it’s able to provide a true two strap binding in this category. It’s clean, simple, and works.
The only thing is that it requires tightening the ankle strap, but from my standpoint that’s not a disadvantage. I realize people will say that means you can’t just click and go, id happily say go with something else if you want to click and go (I don’t see many people actually doing that very effectively and still sit down…). For everyone else, if you are standing in your binding and just have to push the ankle ratchet down then I do think more people will find this super simple.
If I ever find myself getting a binding in this category, this is the system I’d use. I could also imagine it might be the only option for some bindings in distant future as I can imagine the company going all in with the concept that there’s zero drawback compared to the same binding that has regular straps. So in a situation like that, if I liked the rest of the binding and this is the only option then I’m fine with that.
While I am very stoked that the market gets this option, I still maintain that this entire category is trying to solve a problem that I don’t really think exists for most riders that know how to strap in. I don’t always crank my ankle strap the same and I prefer that adjustability. This at least gives that. I like that this system allows the high back to be folded in the normal way as there are situations I would not want the high back folded back.
 
#37 ·
I got to mess around with these recently.
The system works and it’s able to provide a true two strap binding in this category. It’s clean, simple, and works.
The only thing is that it requires tightening the ankle strap, but from my standpoint that’s not a disadvantage. I realize people will say that means you can’t just click and go, id happily say go with something else if you want to click and go (I don’t see many people actually doing that very effectively and still sit down…). For everyone else, if you are standing in your binding and just have to push the ankle ratchet down then I do think more people will find this super simple.
If I ever find myself getting a binding in this category, this is the system I’d use. I could also imagine it might be the only option for some bindings in distant future as I can imagine the company going all in with the concept that there’s zero drawback compared to the same binding that has regular straps. So in a situation like that, if I liked the rest of the binding and this is the only option then I’m fine with that.
While I am very stoked that the market gets this option, I still maintain that this entire category is trying to solve a problem that I don’t really think exists for most riders that know how to strap in. I don’t always crank my ankle strap the same and I prefer that adjustability. This at least gives that. I like that this system allows the high back to be folded in the normal way as there are situations I would not want the high back folded back.
Nice that you got to try it. I'm looking forward to seeing/trying in person at some point. I agree that this will probably supersede regular straps for some companies if it works as well as straps but is quicker/easier.

What I don't agree with, at all, is that the entire category is trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist for most riders that know how to strap in. I can strap in while moving (and quickly), but Step On is still much quicker/easier than standard straps for me all while being more performant for my style of riding (freeriding/carving). I can come off of a steep chairlift exit and step on and ride without any pause. I also don't have to bend over and do anything and I'm constantly waiting on other advanced/expert friends that can strap in while moving.
 
#38 ·
Then you’ll find this to be a winner. I do think there’s enough here that is attractive that people will give it a try. Once trying, I think most people will find that’s a true two strap binding that doesn’t come with the stigma and doesn’t look all funny. In most ways, it wouldn’t be converting as it’s more or less the same binding. For example, when it comes out it’ll be Katana at first. It’s a slightly altered chassis just to fit the system, but in all honesty it’s the same freaking binding. The Katana with a slightly higher price point might do very well. I’d imagine the cleaver and others follow suit not long after if the system does well.
But yes, the cat track thing is attractive if that’s something you are looking for.
 
#42 ·
I'm usually at a short hill. It's not uncommon to have runs that last less than a minute. The speed of rapid entry bindings really pays off in these situations.

For my Flows, I usually enter facing uphill, so the highback can lay all the way down. The slip baseplate on the NX2 series is also sooo much better than the non-slip baseplate versions (it might be on the Fuse, I didn't check). Your toe slides right in under to toe strap with less effort. It will be interesting to see if any of the FASE bindings adopt that baseplate design.

I have yet to try getting my foot into an open Flow binding while on a cat track. I'm sure it can be done but will require more muscle memory. I used to do that on my old Switch and Burton Step-In bindings, but those required simpler foot motions like the current Burton Step-On style.